Manchin win a matter of interpretation, Imagine that Joe's numbers are down.
http://www.wvgazette.com/News/200805140870
| Welcome | |
|---|---|
| Welcome to <strong>Heavy Hitters!</strong>. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, <a href="/profile.php?mode=register">join our community today</a>! |
|
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jwqss6WG9C4W0n957xhvFsvDqGKwD914QRIG0Manchin has been largely unscathed by the scandal, and nothing in the panel's report suggested he played a role.
"This will not affect Gov. Manchin whatsoever," said Marybeth Beller, a political science professor at Marshall University. "The matter appears resolved."
The Democrats in the state legislature agree. Nothing to see here. Let's move on. Business as usual:JustMike wrote:I don't know why all of those WVU officials are resigning. Joe and Heather seem fairly set on keeping their jobs. Once football season starts, no one will give a hoot about anything else anyway.
http://www.getelephantwars.com/republicangazette.htmlDemocrat lawmakers on Tuesday refused to investigate the scandal at West Virginia University that led to the daughter of Gov. Joe Manchin being awarded an eMBA degree she did not earn.
Del. Jonathan Miller, R-Berkeley, requested the investigation by the Joint Judiciary Committee, and asked for bipartisan support, but Democrats voted down Miller and fellow Republicans in a voice vote, signaling their
willingness to turn a blind eye to the scandal in their efforts to protect the governor.
WVU receives about one-third of its annual operating budget -- or more than $200 million -- from state appropriations, but Democrats apparently do not believe that level of public funding includes any responsibility for oversight.
Some Democrats openly scoffed at Miller's resolution, while others appeared visibly angry, both during and after the vote.