Heavy Hitters!

Ithink its time for political correctness to take the dirt nap,and rid ourselves of the scum ,kinda like a societal douche...

afan wrote:Not really very complicated. It doesn't matter if the Muslim extremist was a psychiatrist or a pot scrubber. He should have been sent to Levenworth the first time he spoke out about the mission, made sidicious statements and started playing games about deploying. He certainly should have been disciplined the first time he was caught prosthetising to injured combat troops at Walter Reed.

Let's see - his history included taking off to pray multiple times each day, he would NOT allow women in his presence (gee, could that possibly be an issue in a hospital setting, military or otherwise?), and then he complained that he was being harassed for not doing anything to act like he wanted to be in the military?

There is much, much more to this clown's story. What baffles me is why he was still in a position to cause any harm, including psychological, to our military troopers. His associations, his history, his job performance, his insistence on having the Army conform to his wishes, all indicate that he should have been put out long ago.

Now, who were the other shooters?

You raise some very good questions that I have never read before on other blogs and message boards... Very good !

Fort Hood shooting: Texas army killer linked to September 11 terrorists

Major Nidal Malik Hasan worshipped at a mosque led by a radical imam said to be a "spiritual adviser" to three of the hijackers who attacked America on Sept 11, 2001.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... rists.html

josiewales wrote:I was just curious if the military will impose the death penalty for this Major Malik Nadal Hasan since it involved all military personel on a military reservation. And the military will conduct the trial . Its perfectly clear he is guilty of these murders at Fort Hood Texas.

Will it be considered a time of war ( carry the death penalty only in time of war.) ???? The military soliders at Fort Hood was getting prepared to go to war was'n't they ? Or does this mean in a combative war when on a mission ?

But the state of Texas executes 20th inmate this year 2009. Maybe this will have a impact on this case at Fort Hood, Texas..


Just curious, maybe someone else has more knowledge than I do.....

** Under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 15 offenses can be punishable by death, though many of these crimes -- such as desertion or disobeying a superior commissioned officer's orders -- The "convening authority" -- a high-ranking commanding officer who decides to bring the case to trial -- chooses whether the government will seek a death sentence.

If the case is referred capitally, the defendant cannot choose a bench [judge only] trial; rather, the case must be tried before a panel of at least five military members (DPIC note: now 12 members are required on the panel for a capital case (RCM 501(a)).The Uniform Code of Military Justice also precludes the defendant in a capital case from pleading guilty. Thus, every military death penalty case is resolved by trial before a panel of servicemembers.**

http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/us-mili ... y#overview

They won't have the balls to go for the death penalty.

Before the stench of gunsmoke had abated, the liberal, leftist, progressives were busy turning reasons into excuses. Well, what they thought were reasons. I find it impossible to excuse slaughtering innocent people. From the time I was born until now, I have been around guns. Several times I have been extremely angry, several times I have been extremely scared; but I have never been tempted to get a gun and kill anyone much less go to the mall and shoot everyone in sight.

Of course this is the aftermath of PC. Hasan lived a life of privilege. One does NOT have to read between the lines to recognize this. Why should he be deployed? Why should he be bound by procedures? Procedures are for saps! One wonders how many times he played the "Poor Muslim" card and got away with it!

At this very moment the liberal, leftist, progressives in the army and government are covering up this mess. Shredders are working overtime and being burned up from use. People are being told their careers are at risk if they tell the truth. The LLPs will get away with it just as they have in the past. The final result of all the investigations will be an action by a crazy man. In no way will his being muslim be a factor. In less than a year anyone who brings up this massacre will be looked upon in contempt by the LLPs, and they will do everything they can to silence the rabble rouser.

In this "Brave New World" truth is the worst enemy!



go Glenn Beck

The left and terror
By J.R. Dunn

The Jihadis will return. We know this, in the same way that we know about death and taxes. Thanks in large part to the weakening of our defensive efforts under the new administration, there will be further attacks against this country's population, perhaps even worse than those of 9/11. (This week's attack by Nidal Malik Hasan serves to underline the threat.)

The American left is unparalleled at wriggling out of deadly cul-de-sacs of its own creation. Consider how many times since the Vietnam War this country's left has involved itself in activities that in saner epochs would have resulted in lengthy jail sentences. Support for the Sandinistas and the Salvadoran FMLN, the Nuclear Freeze movement (a KGB operation from start to finish), cooperation with Palestinian and related terrorist groups. In each case, the left continued its involvement until the bitter end; and in each case skipped off with no consequences. This offhand attitude toward sedition has its roots in the excesses of the witch-hunt era. The aura of martyrdom donned by the left since the early 50s has bought them a free pass for over half a century.

My own experience suggests otherwise. In September 2001 I had a part-time position as copy-editor for a small but well-known national magazine. Within days of 9/11 -- and I mean days; not weeks or months -- while the smoke was still rising, I began receiving copy containing pieces suggesting that the terrorists -- Moussaoui in particular -- were poor, misunderstood victims in need of therapy. That there was far more to the event than appeared -- one short piece contained the first suggestion I saw of what was to become known as the "Truther" movement. But possibly the worst was a call for the assassination of John Ashcroft by one of the magazine's regular writers. Calling the editor's attention to this, I was told that it was not necessarily Ashcroft, since the writer did not mention his full name. (It was "John A.", or something of that sort.)

I wrote a short memo outlining my objections. What I got in reply was a blast of vituperation accusing me of slander, McCarthyism, and promoting censorship. That last was quite true; that's exactly what I was doing. But wartime changes things -- certain activities that are perfectly acceptable in times of peace have to go by the board. Or did (editor's name here) really think that he'd breeze through airport security as usual on his next business trip?

That's how it looked from my small corner. No lag time, no hesitation -- left-of-center writers knew what was required of them and produced it. There were similar signs on the wider public stage -- Michael Moore berating the Jihadis for their choice of targets, Some obtuse blurt from Susan Sontag. That nameless pol in San Francisco blaming America first. But much of the left decided the better part of valor lay in keeping their mouths shut -- courage is not a widely-displayed trait in that crowd either.

As for the Jihadis, they are victims in arms -- revolutionaries acting against the imperial state, like the Viet Cong and the Sandinistas before them. Islam, reactionary politics, contempt for women -- none of that matters, as long as they are active against the common enemy. And the role of the Western leftist is to support and assist these heroes, exactly as occurred with all the revolutionary movements in the past. By "speaking out", by "defying authority", and above all by undercutting any efforts to combat the new revolutionary vanguard. But what of the real victims, you ask, all the innocents left scattered like broken, burnt dolls in New York, and Bali, and London, and Madrid? "Little Eichmanns", in the immortal words of the renowned plagiarist, Ward Churchill. Or perhaps you prefer ancient the leftist slogan: "You can't make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.

And much much more...



go Glenn Beck

Officials: U.S. Aware of Hasan Efforts to Contact al Qaeda
Army Major in Fort Hood Massacre Used 'Electronic Means' to Connect with Terrorists

Now the intelligence community is at fault! Next some other group will be at fault. Soon confusion will reign. The upshot will be there is enough blame to go around.

It is NOT Hasan's fault! There were plenty of signs that he needed help.

ALL of Us Failed Hasan!

U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Army Major Nidal Hasan was attempting to make contact with people associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News.

It is not known whether the intelligence agencies informed the Army that one of its officers was seeking to connect with suspected al Qaeda figures, the officials said.

One senior lawmaker said the CIA had, so far, refused to brief the intelligence committees on what, if any, knowledge they had about Hasan's efforts.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/fort-hood ... id=9030873



go Glenn Beck

Thanks in large part to the weakening of our defensive efforts under the new administration, there will be further attacks against this country's population, perhaps even worse than those of 9/11.

I don't doubt this for a moment.